Sexuality as a topic in this current version American culture comes with its own set of pitfalls that serve to bring power to the act of copulation by virtue of the amount of danger that it represents. Does this mean that previous more stricture’d eras were inherently more sexual, no doubt. But not with the same level of underlying perversity that is so rampantly evident as in our media rich age. The innuendos are ever present even though they remain politely unvoiced. A casual meeting elbow to elbow with a stranger can sympathetically invoke a whole host of taboos that both parties seem liable to violate if nothing else but within the theater of the mind. This sense of latent residual sexual tension can act as both irritant or stimulation depending upon the individuals mental state.
Women seem to to be told by current media that they are in control to a greater level than ever before. This of course only holds true by virtue of the compliance of different cults of the opposite sex whose initiative constantly derided and beaten back by the same programming. Certain categories of males coming from safely disenfranchise minorities are metaphorically afforded a greater level of connubial potential sexually speaking for females in general not only from a point of the ongoing social re-engineering of society into a globalist mindset but equally from the point of view of heightening the level of social and sexual tension. As a society we are sold a Politically Correct bill of goods that preaches ‘oneness’ but simultaneously enforces a fear based form of xenophobia based upon the enforcement of a class based lexicon of ‘do’s and don’ts’. Essentially this program is designed to permit stratification within heretofore unassailable blocks of ethnic identity and re-pattern the fractured elements in a controllable ‘bantu’-ized structure.
Violation of existing social dictums in this sense take on a much more potency that is a culture that is directed primarily within the context of electronic voyeurism and social media based ease dropping. The ‘danger level’ of the mundane becomes insufficient to satiate the animal desires repressed within and a greater level of what is politely termed as ‘experimentation’ is accommodated and misrepresented as being liberatingly ‘free’. The factor of the actual personality becomes secondary to the experience or in some cases even interruptive of the central fantasy that is inscribed upon the physical connection by some internalized Hollywood Internet driven scripts. The landscape then becomes a psychological hall of mirrors where both parties quickly run into pitfalls an have to engage in an extended checklist of safety measures before going forth into the animal ridden unknown. There is no doubt that given this sense of socially repressive barbed wire many resort to the exclusionary clause of imbibing a little too much alcohol as a mitigating factor to explain non-compliance with these subtle but strict codes. It seems highly ironic that the seminal scribbling of one, George Blair, might so accurately describe the emotional tenor of the start of many modern day relationships.