It begins to become clear that like some philosophers of old who have made this argument in the past, society has been modeled after a prison. The bars are economic and the little grass roots we are merely tolerated on a work release basis. Each day we must prove ourselves worthy of remaining alive lest one be outed and die by falling into the invisibility of poverty and a state of starvation both mental and physical. The whole dirty racket depends upon a physical rewiring of areas of population deemed acceptable into 24/7 monitoring and propaganda distribution zones. A corporate farm if you like where the animals are removed from any figment of their biological habitat into the abstract environment of pens. But in the specific case of the human species expected to practice this perverted sense of animal husbandry upon themselves. The idea of the right to individually possess land and conduct independent trade and finance is effectively verboten. Institutional dependency is based upon the vast global ‘just in time‘ delivery mechanism that insures that the inmates dare not rebel lest the expected base level of sustenance be terminated without an alternative supply. This is highly ironic light of the projected illusion of ‘a plenty like never before’ but not without precedent given the legal excesses of nineteenth century European empires as perpetuated by landed hereditary monarchs. It seems that these leopards have changed their spots and with the help of their previous minions formerly social pariahs with which they have intermarried their fortunes and destiny’s to rule the earth like the counterparts of old in eighteenth century South Asian nawab focused societies.
Does the rise-fail-collapse repetition model of history suggests that any attempt at society leads inevitably to the same conclusion of a destruction of individualistic impulses for the sake of the evolution of the hive mind? The process of Globalization depends upon economic fragmentation. The occasional ‘green grass‘ of next door must ever be aggrandized then plowed over to be seeded with the same old crops currently available to everyone else. Unfortunately, the acceptable foodstuffs are deceptively composed of inert fillers that only insure minimal standards of physical existence. The idea of self-delusional illusions having been mentally implanted as the natural evolutionary step after the previous milestones of lifestyle based commodities superseding the former simple utilitarian need for reliable functionality. The human species is merely expected to perceive well-being as a means of coping by mentally defying the increasingly normal state of a paucity of available resources. It is very hard to consider a rebellion against the governing system if one’s only viable option is to destroy the monocular assistance that it affords. The mice always return very reluctantly once again to wait by the lever for grains of corn when they have been denied any other option of the artificial maze.
If anybody bothers to listen and look over a period of years they might notice that this is never an election but a popularity contest for previously selected candidates. The rulers of the global economic pyramid have long decided that they do not want borders to their one-world system. The featured puppets that garner most airtime merely speak the message of their patrons. “No borders, no walls, high taxes, no domestic monetary system judicial legislation, etc, etc,etc.” All crimes are forgiven or ignored if the spokesperson does God’s (or Satans) work! It seems odd that modern sense of positivism in terms of commentary seems to be a Christmas stocking mentality of “he/she will bring me this . . .” rather than ” Now I can get it myself.” This is a revolving door that people get stuck in thinking that the new messiah is going to turn the crony based system with a strike of his/her sword on stone. One person’s Joan of Arc is only the moronic equivalent of another person’s Simon Magus. The result being that only after the faux ritual transition to the next evolutionary level of a centralized progression does a substantive sense of change arrive . This being simply of a new terminology replacing the old. There will be no collapse or shift of power if people do not take the reins of power over for themselves and take their own lives back by a sense of positive personal action rather than knee jerk verbal physically inactive reaction.