Guess what! It is OK to have differing views from either extreme of the political debate. What is not OK is the current climate of vitriol that is being fostered by influential segments of the unified world press establishment. The current notion of constant unceasing harangue historically symptomatic of core leftist rules of engagement. The ideology of getting your way codified in the heyday of the 1960’s by one Saul Alinsky. A University of Chicago student of the post war era who freely bragged about how his methodology which he claimed was mentored by Chicago crime boss Frank Nitti could literally get you free lunch. In reality of course the lineage of this sort of strategy goes much further back through time through its employ by Bolshevik inspired Communist Doctrine through nineteenth century rabble rousing efforts of the ‘Communard’s‘ of the late eighteen forties. One would have hope that in the twenty-first century that the larger more civil ‘We‘ would have ‘politically evolved’ out of that mentality.
Maybe the term ‘PC‘ which veils the incessant employ of that strategy should now transform to a new acronym of ‘PE‘. The physical education of ‘Political Evolved’ dialogue of civil discussion based upon forging a commonality of diametric views through intelligent efforts for consensus. Believe it or not that is not at all a new concept. The wanting one’s cake and frosting so as to eat it all by one’s lonesome is over. Acting in a manner of a petulant somewhat violent infant will not serve to bully anyone anymore to any particular point of view. A new sophistication needs to be implemented where parties are not invoked to go ‘nuclear’ to total war if they are not getting what they want.
The true definition of the term Democracy that is ever bandied about involves more than some simple majority dominating by sheer force of numbers. That is the mentality that is quickly ascribed by the apparently Culturally Marxist oriented ‘pink press‘ as being solely ‘Fascist Right Wing‘ but is more than equally shared by their own minions. The reality is that ‘Wiki-Terms‘ have to be enlightened by a broader understanding of how to approach coming to terms with people and views you may not like or agree with through looking at the process as an ongoing evolution of one’s own willingness to understand things from a factual basis and not an oft repeated slogan popularly harangued. That is the touchstone that will see our suffering nation back through the gauntlet of despair that it has for too long been a whipping boy.