The ongoing social battle of gender in recent decades has become significant of a cultural phrasing of arguments that suggest in a very politically tinged manner that there are no inherent differences between the sexes. Consider that making a statement like these against the current over domineering climate of the eternal victimhood concept that applies to women through Feminism, those of pure African genetic descent through slavery, to those born into the religious circle of Talmudic Judaism through the self-publicized mythical genocide of their members. The fact is that all over the world if these groups in different mixtures are not directly holding offices of power then they are indirectly influencing through ownership of the universal platform of the media. Therefore in the context of this conversation much like the Catholic church in Europe in the sixteenth century, their word is essentially law. Any viewpoint that detracts or subverts the major tenants of this power bloc become instant heresy unworthy of regard in a public forum.
To speak about the positive inherent virtues of maleness in this climate is subject to instantaneous scorn and univocal derision. Worse yet, to include in the discussion the longstanding customs and beliefs of Northern Europe and the evolution of Western tradition in an equally constructive way brings instant attack. The narrative of what in the politically sanitized world of multiculturalism is considered unlawful appropriation and tyranny by European males can only be seen in a completely negative context. Essentially, anything that benefits the same must be scurrilous propaganda. Thus to speak of the relative qualities of each of the respective sexes is handicapped in the same manner that Copernicus’ contentions presented to the Vatican that the earth was not the center of the world. The persistence in maintaining such thoughts was akin to wanting to self-destructively roast one’s toes tied to a burning stake in the public square. The argument that there are inherent natures in the species is not allowed. The irony of this being that the replacement of religion as an intellectual arbiter by the cult of world Socialism’s more preferred vehicle of Science as worship defies the same conclusions with other species. No one in their right mind as a scientist would say that gender does not exist in mammals in the wild. Furthermore there is the massive weight of studies on the subject in detail for almost every species that go into miniscule detail based upon similar habits and actions ingrained throughout each respective species.
To examine the persistent tendencies in outlooks and behaviors of either genders is by the fact of this political imposition of the expression of behavior that outwardly demonstrates equality and randomness not an impossibility. It is a glaring fact that the inherent nature of the differences in outlook of each sex does categorize the type of behavior one is likely to expect when all is said and done. This premise stands in defiance of the ‘tabla raza’ mentalities of the human being as empty vessel favoring the persistently unverifiable ‘sciences’ of psychology and sociology. Whatever declaration one might make based upon the cultural narrative of history of men and women and the social structures reflective of same tasked with promoting the growth and continued survival of same there is a core of common behaviors that are perpetually significant as being respective to each. If one filters out the politics from the discussion then overall one might suggest that men are independent and forward thinking while women are consensus based and concerned with maintaining current stability. Without any judgment these among all the other characteristics when taken to the extreme outside the context of the complexity of the family unit are demonstratively counterproductive. Yet as part of a well-balanced social unit that respects these tendencies as equal in importance and vital the species has survived and prospered for millennia. The current angst that has been foisted upon modern societies that this is a form of males dominated slavery is immediately convicted of heresy by its own premise.
Consider that whatever the persistent counterproductive behavior of males that is assumed comes in this modern era from a overwhelming proclivity of households dominated by single females who hold near to total influence over their offspring during the most crucial years of behavioral development. How then could the so called disease of maleness be so easily translated in the absence of a father? The social impact of the willful policy of instilling a confusion of genders to defeat this is in the larger demographic sense of same impotent against changing the core outlooks of either sex. Though they might outwardly operate in the appearance and manner of the other their internal outlook in the best case of that theory becomes artificial and confused. Confusion in general being the epitome of the current age of Draconian Socialism a powerful tool of the few being able to manipulate the many. By no accident the move to supposedly accommodate the minority by restricting the majority a common practice in active situations of Globalist centered governance. Any government form or standing bureaucratic policy of late quickly eschews this. The state in terms of public policy and its aim to increase its control over humanity, “for the public good”, is the enemy of the traditional extended family unit. While many that through indoctrination are socially enlightened may advance the state sanctioned mentalities of conundrums like “White Privilege” or “Paternal Dominance” their logic forever flies int he face of the conflict inherent and planned by state as part of this transition. The reality being that those of differing opinions must inevitably clash proving not much more that a physical total conquest or a deposing of the current world order to settle the argument. In the meantime, the persistent nagging tendencies for males to act like men and females to act like women will persist despite all measure to suppress them.