Connect the dots!
It is in the biological nature of women to relish stability. Men are somewhat less so in terms of looking beyond the risk of the unknown.
The world as conjured by civilized humanity is operated via the act of observation and guided by the manufacture of consensus into viewpoints amenable to the masses. The store of the same being something to be considered as reliable experience, (AKA., knowledge).
The current most acceptable religion being the creative mumbo jumbo of the Scientific Method.
A process that is based upon the notion of the absolute same result reliably able to be yielded in any corner of the planet by anyone performing the experiment by acceptable methods demonstrating what is then termed as absolute proof vindicating the veracity of the theory as borne out by the demonstration.
One of the most famous of these being the Michelson Morley experiment that speaks to the nature of light and its speed in the mysterious ‘aether’. One of the most repeated famous experiment that has evidenced the troublesome characteristic of yielding a result that is influenced by the observer.
A general phenomena where the party conducting the experiment changes the results by the fact of their simple observation of it.
In current understanding of business economics of the last thirty years this is equivalent a parallel notion of stakeholder and business ecology
The officially sanctioned interpretation of Semantics is the basis of civilization in that by fashioning a new subset of novel terminology one conjures a new body of thought. There is a progression and structured sense sense of overlap inherent in the use of terminology providing the possibility of growth through a consecutive ever expanding assembly of descriptive logos.
The social hegemony crafts consensus, both past and present, defining what valid observation is to be allowable for all the members of the social structure that it actively controls. Some of this it based upon mutually agreeable animal experience and some by artful abstractions purposely designed to confuse if challenged. The notion of this agenda behind the rule of the total social organism always employed to contravene and supersede the interests of its individual component parts.
Yet a singular individual life experience cannot be said to be fully shareable or intimately understood by one human being to another in terms of each other. There are experiential boundaries that limit one’s direct appreciation of observable experience. Try looking at the back of your body without a mirror. It is observably there to others but you will never know it through the same direct experience without the aid of an intervening tool or a reliance on the observations of another.
Some people possess additional capabilities that are not shared by others. This might include extraordinary physical, intellectual, aesthetic, or even para-normal ablities that exceed or are incomprehensible to those of the elite class that maintains control over society.
Does this mean that their sense of perception, as it does not possess a common experience or manifest a common terminology, is not to be considered as valid? Especially if it conflicts with the middling consensus afforded to the masses by the hegemony that directs the society?
Humans have a very notable independent animal nature. One that does not heed the same linear logic of group sanctioned consensus to effectively function in a manner totally removed and separate the from same. Survival in an uncivilized environment offering chaos being an example where intuition and personal experience count for more than socially acceptable intellect.
Terminology equating similar perceptions in the patois of different cultures is more often reductive not deductive. The most dominant world culture of the hour shifts meaning towards the focus of its own outlook in the process of translation. That does not equate to a one = one level of human understanding any more than individual human experience to that of a mob.
The validity of instinct or intuition does not need to be substantiated to one’s rationing intelligence to be sanctioned as viable. The classic ‘man upon the horse’ model of Aristotelian synthesis suggests a balance between the two most obvious aspects of human nature. Theoretically, rational knowledge providing a more reliable alternative by the prejudice of modern civilized opinions. But not always!
Freud as the active political proto-Zionist of his era offering an evaluation of the human species along the lines of ancient desert mentalities by analogizing human experience with its component of irrational animal experience as a maze of infernal caves rife with lurking unresolved forms of anti-social menace . Psychology, as the world class contemporary political tool wielded by this state sanctioned pseudo science isolate the individual from the acceptably sane group and institutionally makes him vulnerable to the absolute power of its governing hegemony as ‘unfit’.
The validity of experiencing phenomena outside the experience of the governing hegemony is by definition invalid to the acceptable beliefs of the social unit if it comes into conflict with its agenda. Traditional organized belief based religions in the present sense of a supervening modern belief of a strictly material based realm of human experience are not considered as more than quaint cultural myths that reflect the choice of lifestyle.
Those in upper levels of society being prone to the same mix of human phenomena without the same conventional restraints of the masses that they supervise prone to a sense of megalomaniac rationality that both powers their indifference to making mistakes of judgement and indemnifies them from the consequences. Their sense of remoteness and anonymity separating them from general public visibility a comfortable form of insulation.
A few millions lives here, a few million lives there, compared to the functioning of their larger long term agenda being inconsequential in their calculation’s. Their approximation of godhood and omniscience operating on a completely different basis of concern, One always more concerned with maintaining their position and its uninterrupted longevity and suggesting that it forms the basis for a universal continuum of human stability.
To see the sudden outgrowth of an unexpected uncontrollable epidemic strictly from a material sense of contact to contact contagion is to miss the point that all these dynamics of political based rule and prevailing ideology are not inherently inducted as part of a cloistered agenda. Those functionaries, by their very nature, located up and down in the ruling hegemony exercising influence based primarily upon promoting their own influence as a matter of survival.
The larger scenario is a function of the way conventional society interacts with unexpected chaos. The continued existence of the hegemony being more important than individual blocs of people’s lives at a certain point. The twisting of logic and suppression of factual data by that overbearing hegemony often contravening common sense logic.
The effectiveness and necessity of wearing a mask is currently a case in point. The official dismissiveness of using the same by common citizenry having more to do with a cynical strategy to cover up the obvious oversights of those in positions of social responsibility to not have foreseen the need for this resource in adequate quantities. Per the previous public literature produced by these same governmental entities, a mask WILL decrease your chances of both spreading and catching a vital based aerosol spread disease!
The fact that technologically developed nations routinely do break their vows in covertly encouraging policies and programs that lead to the creation of every kind of imaginable weapon of ultimate destruction possible is borne out in the annals of history. The English and Germans with mustard and chlorine gas in WWI. The Japanese with anthrax in WW2, and the Russia and the USA with all manner of subsequent variants of the same throughout the cold war.
A here-to-fore impossible genetic hybrid might very well be evident in the current mix! Especially if it has been telegraphed in entertainment genres by the state based propaganda vehicle of Hollywood.