The times that all human being live in have now become subsumed in the conversation of a ‘one world’ philosophy. The notion that on every level of importance every human being has their proverbial ‘eggs’ in one basket. But is this really true? The clarion call of Liberalism, Feminism, amd Socialism, all provide a chorus declaring that victims must have preferential consideration to the point that governments have gotten in the habit of classifying their populations by race, gender, background, and military service. The idea being to assesses a certain relative value of importance along the lines of the common dogma of these ism’s. Children are taught from just past infancy to abide by these standards of evaluation minding them in an importance far above and beyond the needs of traditional basics like reading, computing, and analyzing reality for effective truths. The group as a singular entity stressed over the needs of an individual. The end result being that certain classifications of victims that make up a small percentage of any given society are allowed to dominate it. Quite an exercise inverting the notion of plural Democracy to an insignificant level of importance and substituting the tyranny of those that are essentially a perpetual victim class.
So where does this all come from?
One merely has to look at both world and domestic history to find a current of players and events that have led to this ongoing attempt to restructure society. The times leading up to the nineteenth century saw society transformed into a global colonial world created by a small elite merchant class that established linkages with the hegemony’s of ocean going societies to exploit other less technologically savvy cultures to extract their goods and market them back home to urban consumers of their own regions. Competition became the watchword of these exploits leading to global based military exchanges with both the societies at the source providing these goods and those competing to amass them as well. The cost of this business invariably being ceded to a standing military budget to outfit and equip armies operating in many parts of the globe. The cost of same being a burden on the traditional populations at home who were heavily taxed and eventually coaxed off their traditional land to join a centralized number of growing urban populations. These populations being endemically poverty stricken and a perfect recruiting ground to replace losses in personnel supplying the manpower needs of these extensive networks of trade.
Over several centuries the stability of these respective societies adjacent to each other declined into continual competition and warfare. The idea of national boundaries versus hereditary regional identity based land holdings took precedence. The continual destabilization of smaller territories within was intellectually reformed into notions of a universality of ethos’ based upon fixed national boundaries where a common identity was fostered based upon a hegemony far up the scale of a particular region. The scions of the international merchant class seeing the opportunity to adopt a self-serving Machiavellian perspective of pitting one group against the other so as to financially support and benefit both groups. The winners of these constant inter-cine rivalries paying off the debts to the lenders. International finance was born an a new version of slavery was invented where both men and women became commodities.
As the methods of warfare became more sophisticated and lethal and a continual series of conflicts began to decimate the peaceful populations of cultures both at home and far off at the source of goods, the general populations who were most affected began to balk at the necessity of these struggles. The merchant class, ever willing to use any development to their advantage, fostered this sort of instability in the most stable and dominant of national empires so as to foster more conflict. Eventually toppling one of the most major longstanding dominant players. A series of conflicts on massive scales disrupted other major adjacent empires until a point some decades after a sense of general rebellion against the ruling structures of these countries were put in jeopardy of total overthrow to be replaced by plural democracy based republics. Their theoretical model being an offshore former colony that had inadvertently won a measure of independence from the influence of its motherland. Though the presiding merchant class had to some degree been involved in this process it did not enjoy the total control and influence that was to be expected in the mother countries within which it freely operated. A long period of attempts to fractionalize and divide this new independent national entity ensued with only partial success.
The venicle of war being the ultimate ace card employed being used in a series of economic competition based conflicts dragging this evolving nation into successive foreign conflicts that at best only served the financial interests of that nations growing business elites. Exploitation of the vast resources of that land leading to a level of independent prosperity that was hard to compete with led this merchant class to subvert the upper levels of government through financial corruption implementing precedents and independently owned foreign institutions to take over the management of the national economy. It was not long until this group secured control of the press and major businesses to gear them to their aim of centralizing their influence worldwide. Two major unimaginably bloody international conflicts later the wrecked economies of all the major nation states were slowly re-congealed into regional corporate influenced democracies. The current world of a tightly controlled credit based hegemony run by an invisible elite was pout into place.
The rights of the individual commercialized into a social credit score where a technologically monitored central entity administered society based upon constantly rating individual compliance with manager based regulations. The A.I. based system in place offering no tolerance of any infraction or unauthorized independence. The respective penalty being imposed with no hearing. This is the state of the world up to the present tense. WE, globally, are at the juncture where if this allowed to happen through the facade of crisis, humankind will simply become beasts of the field for the elite of the ever devious heirs merchant class.
That in my book is intolerable.